The Two Dollar Challenge strives to provide an approximation of living in poverty. As such it has numerous imperfections, some of which are outlined here.

1. We are in a stable society.

Even while attempting to experience some of the obstacles of poverty, participants can expect relative safety. There are no hordes of bandits roaming across campus, and there is continuous access to campus security. On a larger scale, there is no immediate risk of political upheaval, and we can trust those in authority to provide support. Those assigned to protect us will do so; they will not prey upon us. There are no impromptu checkpoints with officials coercing bribes from participants.

2. Participants still have access to a wealth of resources.

Participants can retreat to the comfort of dorms during inclement weather. We maintain access to health care, including immediate emergency care and follow-up services. Our environment is largely disease-free, with no threat of malaria or waterborne illnesses. Boiling water before consumption is a rule, not a life-or-death necessity.

3. We know there is an end just around the corner.

At some point during the week, every participant thinks something along the lines of: “Just two more days.” That countdown provides comfort and makes it easier to continue. For many, this becomes one of the most profound realizations: those living in poverty do not have an end date. This is why the experience works—it sparks empathy and humility.

We believe that the Two Dollar Challenge offers participants a starting point for learning about the harsh realities of poverty. We hope that each participant leaves with a stronger desire to engage more deeply with issues of poverty.

As participants, we remain aware of the shortcomings of this exercise. We also recognize that even a limited glimpse can be moving and worthwhile. Above all, we are transparent: the TDC is an educational simulation, not a lived reality. It is a tool for reflection, not a replication of poverty.